A human rights advocacy group, Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, has condemned the reported deportation of 51 Cameroonians, who were living in Nigeria as asylum seekers or naturalised citizens, by the Federal Government.
The group, in a statement on Sunday by its Deputy Director, Adewale Timothy, said the reported forced eviction of the foreigners was both morally and legally wrong, describing it as human rights abuse.
Timothy said SERAP had already submitted a petition against both the Federal Government and the Cameroonian authorities to the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights in protest against the deportation.
In the petition dated February 2, 2018, SERAP called on the Bureau of the African Commission to urgently intervene and “end the ongoing human rights violations of naturalised Nigerians, refugees and asylum seekers forcibly returned to their country by the Nigerian authorities.”
The petition was addressed to the Chairperson of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights.
The group contended that if not condemned the forced eviction of asylum seekers by the Federal Government would “set a bad precedent for the rest of the sub-region.”
It called on the Chairperson and Bureau of the Commission “to urgently hold an extraordinary session of the African Commission to address the illegal and unfair return of 51 Cameroonian refugees, asylum seekers and naturalised Nigerians, and the continuing violations of the rights of the returnees by the Government of Cameroon.”
SERAP called on the African Commission to “speak out strongly and condemn the unfair treatment of the refugees, asylum seekers and naturalised Nigerians by the Government of Cameroon, and request the government to immediately release them from unlawful detention.”
The group said, “Cameroon’s treatment of the returned naturalised Nigerians, refugees and asylum seekers falls within the ‘worst crimes’ of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which, in article 7, defines crimes against humanity to mean acts such as deportation, imprisonment or other severe deprivation of liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law.”
The group, in a statement on Sunday by its Deputy Director, Adewale Timothy, said the reported forced eviction of the foreigners was both morally and legally wrong, describing it as human rights abuse.
Timothy said SERAP had already submitted a petition against both the Federal Government and the Cameroonian authorities to the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights in protest against the deportation.
In the petition dated February 2, 2018, SERAP called on the Bureau of the African Commission to urgently intervene and “end the ongoing human rights violations of naturalised Nigerians, refugees and asylum seekers forcibly returned to their country by the Nigerian authorities.”
The petition was addressed to the Chairperson of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights.
The group contended that if not condemned the forced eviction of asylum seekers by the Federal Government would “set a bad precedent for the rest of the sub-region.”
It called on the Chairperson and Bureau of the Commission “to urgently hold an extraordinary session of the African Commission to address the illegal and unfair return of 51 Cameroonian refugees, asylum seekers and naturalised Nigerians, and the continuing violations of the rights of the returnees by the Government of Cameroon.”
SERAP called on the African Commission to “speak out strongly and condemn the unfair treatment of the refugees, asylum seekers and naturalised Nigerians by the Government of Cameroon, and request the government to immediately release them from unlawful detention.”
The group said, “Cameroon’s treatment of the returned naturalised Nigerians, refugees and asylum seekers falls within the ‘worst crimes’ of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which, in article 7, defines crimes against humanity to mean acts such as deportation, imprisonment or other severe deprivation of liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law.”
Post a Comment
Post a Comment